Debugging memory leaks
In Scrapy, objects such as requests, responses and items have a finite lifetime: they are created, used for a while and finally destroyed.
Of all those objects, the Request usually has the longest lifetime because it waits in the Scheduler queue until it’s time to process it. For more information, see Architecture overview.
Because these Scrapy objects have a comparatively long lifetime, there is always the risk of accumulating them in memory without releasing them properly and thus causing what is known as a “memory leak”.
To help debug memory leaks, Scrapy provides a built-in mechanism for tracking object references called trackref, and you can also use a third-party library called muppy for more advanced memory debugging (see below for more information). Both mechanisms must be used after connecting to a live crawl.
Common causes of memory leaks
It happens quite often (sometimes by accident, sometimes on purpose) that the
Scrapy developer passes objects referenced in requests—for example, through the
cb_kwargs or meta attributes or
the request callback function—and that effectively ties the lifetime of those
referenced objects to the lifetime of the request. This is, by far, the most
common cause of memory leaks in Scrapy projects, and it can be quite difficult
for newcomers to debug.
In big projects, spiders are typically written by different people, and some of those spiders could be “leaking” and thus affecting the rest of the (well-written) spiders when they run concurrently, which, in turn, affects the whole crawling process.
The leak could also come from a custom middleware, pipeline, or extension that
you wrote if you are not releasing the previously allocated resources properly.
For example, allocating resources on spider_opened but not releasing
them on spider_closed may cause problems if you’re running
multiple spiders per process.
Too Many Requests?
By default Scrapy keeps the request queue in memory; it includes
Request objects and all objects referenced in request
attributes (for example, cb_kwargs and
meta). While this is not necessarily a leak, it can
consume a lot of memory. Enabling the persistent job queue
can help keep memory usage under control.
Debugging memory leaks with trackref
scrapy.utils.trackref is a module provided by Scrapy to debug the most
common cases of memory leaks. It tracks the references to all live Request,
Response, Item, Spider and Selector objects.
You can enter the telnet console and inspect how many objects (of the classes
mentioned above) are currently alive using the prefs() function which is an
alias to the print_live_refs() function:
telnet localhost 6023
>>> prefs()
Live References
ExampleSpider 1 oldest: 15s ago
HtmlResponse 10 oldest: 1s ago
Selector 2 oldest: 0s ago
Request 878 oldest: 7s ago
As you can see, that report also shows the “age” of the oldest object in each
class. If you’re running multiple spiders per process, chances are you can
figure out which spider is leaking by looking at the oldest request or
response. You can get the oldest object of each class using the
get_oldest() function (from the telnet console).
Which objects are tracked?
trackref tracks objects from these classes (and all their subclasses):
A real example
Let’s see a concrete example of a hypothetical case of memory leaks. Suppose we have some spider with a line similar to this one:
return Request(
f"http://www.somenastyspider.com/product.php?pid={product_id}",
callback=self.parse,
cb_kwargs={"referer": response},
)
That line passes a response reference inside a request, which effectively ties the response lifetime to the request’s lifetime, and that will definitely cause memory leaks.
Let’s see how we can discover the cause (without knowing it
a priori, of course) by using the trackref tool.
After the crawler is running for a few minutes and we notice its memory usage has grown a lot, we can enter its telnet console and check the live references:
>>> prefs()
Live References
SomenastySpider 1 oldest: 15s ago
HtmlResponse 3890 oldest: 265s ago
Selector 2 oldest: 0s ago
Request 3878 oldest: 250s ago
The fact that there are so many live responses (and that they’re so old) is definitely suspicious, as responses should have a relatively short lifetime compared to requests. The number of responses is similar to the number of requests, so it looks like they are tied in some way. We can now check the code of the spider to discover the line that is generating the leaks (passing response references inside requests).
Sometimes extra information about live objects can be helpful. Let’s check the oldest response:
>>> from scrapy.utils.trackref import get_oldest
>>> r = get_oldest("HtmlResponse")
>>> r.url
'http://www.somenastyspider.com/product.php?pid=123'
If you want to iterate over all objects instead of getting only the oldest one,
you can use the scrapy.utils.trackref.iter_all() function:
>>> from scrapy.utils.trackref import iter_all
>>> [r.url for r in iter_all("HtmlResponse")]
['http://www.somenastyspider.com/product.php?pid=123',
'http://www.somenastyspider.com/product.php?pid=584',
...]
Too many spiders?
If your project has too many spiders executed in parallel, the output of
prefs() can be difficult to read. For this reason, that function has an
ignore argument that you can use to omit a particular class (and all its
subclasses). For example, this won’t show any live references to spiders:
>>> from scrapy.spiders import Spider
>>> prefs(ignore=Spider)
scrapy.utils.trackref module
Here are the functions available in the trackref module.
- class scrapy.utils.trackref.object_ref(*args: Any, **kwargs: Any)[source]
Inherit from this class if you want to track live instances with the
trackrefmodule.
- scrapy.utils.trackref.print_live_refs(ignore=NoneType)[source]
Print a report of live references, grouped by class name.
- scrapy.utils.trackref.get_oldest(class_name: str) Any[source]
Return the oldest object alive with the given class name, or
Noneif none is found. Useprint_live_refs()first to get a list of all tracked live objects per class name.
- scrapy.utils.trackref.iter_all(class_name: str) Iterable[Any][source]
Return an iterator over all objects alive with the given class name. Use
print_live_refs()first to get a list of all tracked live objects per class name.
Debugging memory leaks with muppy
trackref provides a convenient mechanism for tracking down memory leaks,
but it only keeps track of the objects that are more likely to cause them.
However, sometimes leaks come from other (more or less obscure) objects. If
that happens and you can’t find your leaks using trackref, you still have
another resource: the muppy library.
muppy is available as part of Pympler.
If you use pip, you can install muppy with the following command:
pip install Pympler
Here’s an example that shows all Python objects available in the heap using muppy:
>>> from pympler import muppy
>>> all_objects = muppy.get_objects()
>>> len(all_objects)
28667
>>> from pympler import summary
>>> suml = summary.summarize(all_objects)
>>> summary.print_(suml)
types | # objects | total size
==================================== | =========== | ============
<class 'str | 9822 | 1.10 MB
<class 'dict | 1658 | 856.62 KB
<class 'type | 436 | 443.60 KB
<class 'code | 2974 | 419.56 KB
<class '_io.BufferedWriter | 2 | 256.34 KB
<class 'set | 420 | 159.88 KB
<class '_io.BufferedReader | 1 | 128.17 KB
<class 'wrapper_descriptor | 1130 | 88.28 KB
<class 'tuple | 1304 | 86.57 KB
<class 'weakref | 1013 | 79.14 KB
<class 'builtin_function_or_method | 958 | 67.36 KB
<class 'method_descriptor | 865 | 60.82 KB
<class 'abc.ABCMeta | 62 | 59.96 KB
<class 'list | 446 | 58.52 KB
<class 'int | 1425 | 43.20 KB
For more information about muppy, refer to the muppy documentation.
Leaks without leaks
Sometimes you may notice that the memory usage of your Scrapy process only increases and never decreases. Unfortunately, this could happen even though neither Scrapy nor your project are leaking memory. This is due to a not-so-well-known problem in Python, which may not return released memory to the operating system in some cases. For more information on this issue see:
The improvements proposed by Evan Jones, which are detailed in this paper, got merged in Python 2.5, but this only reduces the problem, it doesn’t fix it completely. To quote the paper:
Unfortunately, this patch can only free an arena if there are no more objects allocated in it anymore. This means that fragmentation is a large issue. An application could have many megabytes of free memory, scattered throughout all the arenas, but it will be unable to free any of it. This is a problem experienced by all memory allocators. The only way to solve it is to move to a compacting garbage collector, which is able to move objects in memory. This would require significant changes to the Python interpreter.
To keep memory consumption reasonable, you can split the job into several smaller jobs or enable the persistent job queue and stop and start the spider from time to time.